VerifyKitv0.13.3

Compare

Honest, sourced comparisons of how VerifyKit stacks up against the other ways to verify PDF digital signatures — the commercial document platforms, the European Commission’s reference validator, and the open-source JavaScript ecosystem.

Every page below compares on the same eight questions, because a signed PDF can pass any subset of them and the difference matters to whoever reads the verdict: whether the bytes are intact, whether the PKCS#7 signature verifies, whether the certificate chains to a root you trust, whether it had expired at signing time, whether an RFC 3161 timestamp proves when that was, whether the certificate was revoked before or after signing, and whether the algorithm and key usage were sound.

Collapsing those into one boolean loses the information a user needs. “Invalid” and “the certificate expired in 2024 and there was no timestamp to prove when it was signed” are the same verdict and completely different messages.

These pages quote API names and link the vendor documentation each claim comes from, so every row is checkable. Where a comparison says a capability is “not documented,” it means that vendor’s own verification guide does not cover it — a question worth asking them, not a proven absence. And where a competing product does something VerifyKit does not — signing, editing, redaction, OCR, mobile SDKs — each page says so first.